Search

Search Type:

Today's News and Humor
How to Avoid Looking Like an American Tourist
The Coldest Desert On Earth
Strange Polar Bear Cub Facts
Strange Facts About Hair Growth
Strange Trivia Quiz



Special Images and Pictures
STRANGE OLD PICTURES, POSTERS, ADS AND PHOTOGRAPHS
OLD CIRCUS ITEMS - ANIMALS, CIRCUS FREAKS AND ODDITIES
STRANGE HOUSES & BUILDINGS - Structures - Bridges - Highways
BEER - Liquor - Wine - Cocktails - Shots - Mixed Drinks
STRANGE ALBUM & CD COVERS - STRANGE BOOKS


Strange Survey
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON TODAYS PUBLIC EDUCATION?
 I DON'T CARE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER
 IT'S ABOUT THE SAME AS WHEN I GREW UP
 IT'S NEVER BEEN WORSE!
 IT'S THE BEST IT'S EVER BEEN
 
View Previous Surveys


Hong Kong Woman Sues Rolex, Claims Rash

Hong Kong Woman Sues Rolex, Claims Rash


Sept. 14, 2005


HONG KONG - A Hong Kong woman has sued Rolex, alleging that a watch she bought caused her psychological trauma because she had to wear long sleeves to cover up an itchy, unsightly skin allergy triggered by a label on the underside of the luxury timepiece, a newspaper reported Thursday.

Lee Ka-wai filed her claim in the Small Claims Tribunal, seeking $6,044 in damages, the South China Morning Post said. She purchased the $3,866 Rolex Oyster Perpetual in August 2004, the newspaper said.

Lee said the skin allergy - scratchy red dots - was caused by a removable label on the back of the watch, the newspaper reported. She didn't remove the label because she was afraid she would lose Rolex's worldwide guarantee or sacrifice proof of the watch's authenticity, it said.

"Rolex should have mentioned it in the manual or asked its agent to remind customers to remove the label," Lee was quoted as saying.

She said that she suffered psychological trauma because she had to wear long sleeves to cover up the unsightly allergic reaction, the newspaper reported.

The Post quoted Rolex official Daniel Neidhart as saying removing the label would not have affected the guarantee or the authenticity of the watch. He said the label merely showed that the watch was new and most customers removed it, the newspaper reported.

The case was adjourned until Oct. 26, the newspaper said.

Submitted by Lee





The Strange Family




 



© 2005 StrangeCosmos.com
Read our Privacy Policy
Phoenix Arizona Real Estate Investment

StrangeCosmos.com StrangeVehicles.com StrangeZoo.com StrangePolitics.com StrangePersons.com
StrangeSports.com StrangeCelebrities.com StrangeMilitary.com StrangeDangers.com StrangePolice.com
StrangeBusiness.com StrangeFunKidz.com StrangeTravel.com    

Disclaimer: We do our best to avoid copyrighted material. If anything on this site has been copyrighted by you, please contact us so we can remove it or give you credit!